“The argument that AI-generated art cannot be considered true art because it lacks the capability to express values, experiences, or opinions about the universe is a narrow-minded and outdated perspective.”
Last week, I published an essay arguing that images and literature generated by Artificial Intelligence cannot be considered true art. Being a true journalist — not having any ideas and loosely copying a New York Times article — I decided to input said essay into ChatGPT, and asked it to write a rebuttal. Below is its response, in which I’ve included by own response to each claim.
“First and foremost, it is important to acknowledge that art has always been a reflection of the society and technology of its time. From cave paintings to digital art, each medium and technique used…